Building Teams That Can Effectively Manage Conflict
Conflict is just a part of working in any team. Whether it's a disagreement on strategy, a clash of personalities, or different ideas about tackling a project, conflicts are going to happen. But here's the thing—not all conflicts are bad. When handled right, they can actually help with problem-solving, spark innovation, and bring the team closer together.
Of course to make the most out of conflicts, you need to have good strategies in place. Think open communication, creating a sense of psychological safety, and making sure everyone gets to share their perspective. These are key to building a productive and resilient workplace but there’s more you can do to go past that and get better business results. In this article, I want to dive into how to build teams that can actually turn conflict into a chance for growth. I’ll be upfront with you all though, if you're hoping for a neat, tidy guide to eliminating conflict in your teams, you're going to be disappointed. And frankly, you should be glad about that disappointment.
This is because of a simple, blunt truth that I feel more leaders need to grasp: your organisation isn't a machine that needs fixing. It's a complex, adaptive system full of living, breathing humans with different perspectives, identities, and ways of seeing the world. Conflict isn't a bug in that system – it's a feature. The real question isn't how to prevent conflict, but how to harness its potential for driving innovation and deeper understanding.
Understanding Conflict as a Catalyst
Before we dive into strategies, it's important to develop our understanding of workplace conflicts. At its core, conflict can come from individuals and groups having different perspectives, values, and motivations. But it can also come because of the systems and processes we’ve got running in the organisation – the context can force people to take contradicting positions, sometimes deliberately. Managing conflict effectively is all about allowing these different viewpoints to come up, exploring what else is going on right now and in turn using them in a positive way. Instead of seeing it as a hurdle, think of conflict as a chance to gain deeper insights, improve the dynamics of your team, and build opportunities for new potential to come through.
I've spent years working with teams, and I've noticed something fascinating: we often treat conflict as a binary thing that can be solved. "If we just had the right process…" or "If people would just communicate better…" Sound familiar?
Here's what this way of thinking misunderstands – your organisation is more like an ecosystem than a machine. When conflict emerges, it's usually a signal that something interesting is happening in that ecosystem. Maybe it's different perspectives bumping up against each other, or perhaps it's How information flows (or doesn’t) or even how decisions get made.. Spotting systemic patterns like these matter far more than any individual disagreement. Either way, treating it like a mechanical problem to be fixed misses the point entirely – it’s fixing the symptom, not the system.
Identifying Conflict
Identifying the landscape in which the disagreement is happening is the starting point for working with it productively. This is a simple one but, you start from where you are now – and if you haven’t got a good sense of that, you’re off to a poor start.! To find a resolution, a team needs to really explore the disagreement and, let's be honest, figuring out all the tangled factors that play into them, isn't exactly a walk in the park.
Conflicts can escalate due to misunderstandings or vague abstractions, like broad references to “problem customers” or “issues with the website.” Making discussions concrete is crucial to uncovering underlying issues and pinpointing exactly where perspectives differ.
Encouraging specificity in conversations helps team members articulate the exact aspects they feel strongly about, promoting greater understanding and alignment. For example, asking “What specific challenges do you see with this customer approach?” invites team members to clarify their views and can reveal insights that benefit the whole group. “Give me an example” and “what actually happened” are great phrases to help people get real rather than abstract about what matters. It often also reveals unexpected elements that turn out to be crucial.
Move Beyond Compromises
Let's puncture a common myth: good conflict management isn't about getting everyone to hold hands and agree. That's not just unrealistic – it's counterproductive. Instead, I encourage teams to embrace what I call "productive tension." Think about it this way: if everyone in your team agrees all the time, someone's probably not speaking up. The goal isn't harmony – it's creating an environment where different perspectives can safely collide and create something new.
So, effective conflict management shouldn’t be about compromise. Instead, it should be about fully understanding the nature of differing perspectives and integrating them to reach a well-informed decision. In reality, compromise may not always be necessary or even beneficial; it’s often more valuable to engage in perspective-sharing to ensure every viewpoint is genuinely understood.
An ongoing dialogue that encourages perspective-sharing allows team members to grasp each other’s unique viewpoints. This continual exchange nurtures a deeper understanding and a more collaborative problem-solving approach without requiring rigid “action plans". By facilitating conversations that explore different perspectives, teams can arrive at more nuanced and innovative solutions.
What’s also fascinating is that conflicts often emerge in patterns across the organisation -rarely in isolation. When we see multiple similar tensions coming up in different teams, it’s often a sign that there’s something in the organisational structure or processes that needs attention.
Building Resilient Teams
The key to building conflict-resilient teams isn't about implementing more processes or rules. I've seen too many organisations try to engineer their way out of conflict with elaborate frameworks and procedures. That's rather like trying to control the weather by building a better umbrella – it might keep you dry, but it doesn't help you understand or work with the patterns of change.
Instead, it's about creating the right conditions:
- First and foremost, your team needs psychological safety – that sense that it's actually okay to disagree, to raise concerns, to challenge assumptions. I'm not talking about warm-fuzzy feel-good sessions here, but the practical reality that people need to know their dissenting voice won't hit them sideways in the corridor later. And that safety doesn’t arise just because you say it’s safe (for many people just saying that is an indication that it probably isn’t) – it comes from actions and visible decisions.
- Beyond safety, you need to actively seek out different perspectives. This isn't just about having diversity targets or representative committees – it's about genuinely valuing and incorporating different viewpoints into how you work. I often tell leaders: if you're hearing the same voices all the time, you're missing most of what's happening in your organisation.
- Your team also needs the space and permission to adapt and evolve their approaches. Think about how footpaths form in parks – they rarely follow the architect's straight lines, instead showing where people actually need to walk. Your team's approaches to handling conflict should be allowed to evolve in the same way, finding the natural paths that work for them.
- This evolution happens through multiple small parallel experiments. Rather than rolling out a grand new conflict management strategy across the organisation, encourage teams to try small changes in how they work together. Maybe it's changing how they run meetings, or trying new ways of making decisions. The key is making these experiments safe-to-fail – meaning it's okay if they don't work out perfectly. It’s not “anything goes” because it needs some constraints, but it’s about learning how different approaches work in different contexts, building a broader range of options in the organisation.
- Crucially, you also need to be monitoring what happens across the organisation as these experiments are happening. Not just for whether conflicts decrease, but for unexpected effects elsewhere in the system – they’ll have unintended consequences that might be the next opportunity or the next threat.
- Which brings me to perhaps the most important condition: making learning part of the explicit process when things go wrong rather than having failure feel like disaster. Every time a conflict emerges or an approach doesn't work quite as planned, that's valuable data about your system. I often ask teams, "What did this conflict teach us about how we work together?" The answers are usually far more useful than any pre-planned conflict resolution process could provide.
By fostering this purpose-driven approach, leaders create resilient teams capable of maintaining high performance even under pressure. The result is a workplace where conflicts become opportunities for innovation rather than obstacles to productivity, directly supporting long-term business success and competitive advantage.
Conflict As A Pathway To Resilience
A final thought I want to leave you with is this – Always remember that your team's ability to handle conflict isn't a fixed trait – it's an evolving capability. Like any complex system, it will continue to change and adapt. Your job isn't to "solve" conflict once and for all, but to help your team develop better ways of using it as a source of insight and innovation.
The next time you see conflict emerging in your team, resist the urge to jump in and fix it. Instead, step back and ask: What's this conflict telling us about our system? What possibilities might it be opening up? And most importantly – how can we use this tension to make our team stronger?
After all, in a complex world, the teams that thrive aren't the ones that avoid conflict – they're the ones that learn to dance with it.
What Next?
For more information on building up your team and organisation to more effectively manage conflict to create a more productive and harmonious working environment for your business, please get in touch with the team at Narrate today.
- Narrative (100)
- Organisational culture (95)
- Communications (93)
- Complexity (77)
- SenseMaker (77)
- Changing organisations (42)
- Cognitive Edge (37)
- Narrate news (35)
- narrative research (32)
- Cognitive science (25)
- Tools and techniques (25)
- Conference references (24)
- Recommendations (20)
- datespecific (20)
- Leadership (17)
- Employee engagement (16)
- Storytelling (15)
- Culture (13)
- Events (11)
- UNDP (11)
- Cynefin (10)
- hints and tips (10)
- internal communications (8)
- Engagement (7)
- Knowledge (6)
- M&E (6)
- customer insight (6)
- tony quinlan (6)
- Branding (5)
- Stories (5)
- culture change (5)
- Children of the World (4)
- Dave Snowden (4)
- Changing organisations (3)
- Courses (3)
- GirlHub (3)
- Medinge (3)
- Travel (3)
- anecdote circles (3)
- development (3)
- knowledge management (3)
- merger (3)
- micro-narratives (3)
- monitoring and evaluation (3)
- presentations (3)
- BRAC (2)
- Bratislava (2)
- Egypt (2)
- ILO (2)
- Narattive research (2)
- Roma (2)
- Uncategorized (2)
- VECO (2)
- citizen engagement (2)
- corporate culture (2)
- counter-terrorism (2)
- customer satisfaction (2)
- diversity (2)
- governance (2)
- impact measurement (2)
- innovation (2)
- masterclass (2)
- melcrum (2)
- monitoring (2)
- narrate (2)
- organisation culture (2)
- organisational storytelling (2)
- research (2)
- sensemaker case study (2)
- sensemaking (2)
- social networks (2)
- speaker (2)
- strategy (2)
- workshops (2)
- 2012 Olympics (1)
- Adam Curtis (1)
- Allders of Sutton (1)
- CASE (1)
- Cabinets and the Bomb (1)
- Central Library (1)
- Chernobyl (1)
- Christmas (1)
- Disaster relief (1)
- Duncan Green (1)
- ESRC (1)
- Employee surveys (1)
- European commission (1)
- Fail-safe (1)
- Financial Times anecdote circles SenseMaker (1)
- FlashForward (1)
- Fragments of Impact (1)
- Future Backwards (1)
- GRU (1)
- Girl Research Unit (1)
- House of Lords (1)
- Huffington Post (1)
- IQPC (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Joshua Cooper Ramo (1)
- KM (1)
- KMUK2010 (1)
- Kharian and Box (1)
- LFI (1)
- LGComms (1)
- Lant Pritchett (1)
- Learning From Incidents (1)
- Lords Speaker lecture (1)
- MLF (1)
- MandE (1)
- Montenegro (1)
- Mosaic (1)
- NHS (1)
- ODI (1)
- OTI (1)
- Owen Barder (1)
- PR (1)
- Peter Hennessy (1)
- Pfizer (1)
- Protected Areas (1)
- Rwanda (1)
- SenseMaker® collector ipad app (1)
- Serbia (1)
- Sir Michael Quinlan (1)
- Slides (1)
- Speaking (1)
- Sutton (1)
- TheStory (1)
- UK justice (1)
- USS vincennes (1)
- United Nations Development Programme (1)
- Washington storytelling (1)
- acquisition (1)
- adaptive management (1)
- afghanistan (1)
- aid and development (1)
- al-qaeda (1)
- algeria (1)
- all in the mind (1)
- anthropology (1)
- applications (1)
- back-story (1)
- better for less (1)
- case study (1)
- change communications (1)
- change management (1)
- citizen experts (1)
- communication (1)
- communications research (1)
- complaints (1)
- complex adaptive systems (1)
- complex probes (1)
- conference (1)
- conferences (1)
- conspiracy theories (1)
- consultation (1)
- content management (1)
- corporate values (1)
- counter narratives (1)
- counter-insurgency (1)
- counter-narrative (1)
- creativity (1)
- customer research (1)
- deresiewicz (1)
- deterrence (1)
- dissent (1)
- downloads (1)
- education (1)
- employee (1)
- ethical audit (1)
- ethics (1)
- evaluation (1)
- facilitation (1)
- fast company (1)
- feedback loops (1)
- financial services (1)
- financial times (1)
- four yorkshiremen (1)
- gary klein (1)
- georgia (1)
- girl effect (1)
- girleffect (1)
- giving voice (1)
- globalgiving (1)
- harnessing complexity (1)
- impact evaluation (1)
- impact measures (1)
- information overload (1)
- informatology (1)
- innovative communications (1)
- john kay (1)
- justice (1)
- kcuk (1)
- keynote (1)
- leadership recession communication (1)
- learning (1)
- libraries (1)
- likert scale (1)
- lucifer effect (1)
- marketing (1)
- minimum level of failure (1)
- narrative capture (1)
- narrative sensemaker internal communications engag (1)
- natasha mitchell (1)
- navigating complexity (1)
- new york times (1)
- newsletter (1)
- obliquity (1)
- organisation (1)
- organisational development (1)
- organisational memory (1)
- organisational narrative (1)
- patterns (1)
- pilot projects (1)
- placement (1)
- policy-making (1)
- population research (1)
- presentation (1)
- protocols of the elders of zion. (1)
- public policy (1)
- public relations (1)
- qualitative research (1)
- quangos (1)
- relations (1)
- reputation management (1)
- resilience (1)
- revenge (1)
- ritual dissent (1)
- road signs (1)
- safe-fail (1)
- safe-to-fail experiments (1)
- sales improvement (1)
- satisfaction (1)
- scaling (1)
- seminar (1)
- seth godin (1)
- social coherence (1)
- social cohesion (1)
- solitude (1)
- stakeholder understanding (1)
- strategic communications management (1)
- strategic narrative (1)
- suggestion schemes (1)
- surveys (1)
- survivorship bias (1)
- targets (1)
- tbilisi (1)
- the future backwards (1)
- tipping point (1)
- training (1)
- twitter (1)
- upskilling (1)
- values (1)
- video (1)
- voices (1)
- weak links (1)
- zeno's paradox (1)
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (2)
- March 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (1)
- November 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (1)
- March 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (1)
- January 2016 (1)
- July 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (1)
- March 2015 (2)
- February 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- November 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (1)
- July 2014 (2)
- June 2014 (6)
- May 2014 (3)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (5)
- January 2014 (4)
- December 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (1)
- June 2013 (1)
- May 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- October 2012 (4)
- September 2012 (3)
- November 2011 (3)
- August 2011 (1)
- July 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (4)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (8)
- January 2011 (8)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (5)
- October 2010 (8)
- September 2010 (5)
- August 2010 (2)
- June 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (3)
- October 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- July 2008 (4)
- June 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (3)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (1)
- September 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (4)
- May 2007 (3)
- March 2007 (1)
- February 2007 (6)
- January 2007 (3)
- November 2006 (8)
- October 2006 (8)
- September 2006 (2)
- August 2006 (5)
- July 2006 (13)
Subscribe by email
You May Also Like
These Related Stories