Is the Tipping Point Toast?
In the last couple of years, there's been a lot of interest in social networks - and (somewhat belatedly) communications professionals are starting to look at greater use of informal networks and word-of-mouth. There's still, however, the temptation to look at the model Malcolm Gladwell sets up in The Tipping Point as one where certain people (Gladwell calls them Connectors, Mavens and Salesmen) have a strong effect on the rest of the world.
For communicators, it's very seductive - if we can just discover who these people are, we can focus our efforts on them and allow the network to take care of the rest...
Earlier this year, however, Duncan Watts studied the problem more rigorously and discovered that it doesn't actually work that way. He created a model of a social network - a virtual environment where he could adjust how strong the connections were between people, how much more influence some had than others, etc. Fast Company reported on the article in Is the Tipping Point Toast?
The results were deeply counterintuitive. The experiment did produce several hundred societywide infections. But in the large majority of cases, the cascade began with an average Joe (although in cases where an Influential touched off the trend, it spread much further). To stack the deck in favor of Influentials, Watts changed the simulation, making them 10 times more connected. Now they could infect 40 times more people than the average citizen (and again, when they kicked off a cascade, it was substantially larger). But the rank-and-file citizen was still far more likely to start a contagion.
Why didn't the Influentials wield more power? With 40 times the reach of a normal person, why couldn't they kick-start a trend every time? Watts believes this is because a trend's success depends not on the person who starts it, but on how susceptible the society is overall to the trend--not how persuasive the early adopter is, but whether everyone else is easily persuaded. And in fact, when Watts tweaked his model to increase everyone's odds of being infected, the number of trends skyrocketed.
For communications/engagement/PR this has really important implications. As, I think, it does for leaders. The individual (no matter how much influence they have) has less effect than the readiness of everyone else to hear the message.
"If society is ready to embrace a trend, almost anyone can start one--and if it isn't, then almost no one can," Watts concludes. To succeed with a new product, it's less a matter of finding the perfect hipster to infect and more a matter of gauging the public's mood. Sure, there'll always be a first mover in a trend. But since she generally stumbles into that role by chance, she is, in Watts's terminology, an "accidental Influential."
Perhaps the problem with viral marketing is that the disease metaphor is misleading. Watts thinks trends are more like forest fires: There are thousands a year, but only a few become roaring monsters. That's because in those rare situations, the landscape was ripe: sparse rain, dry woods, badly equipped fire departments. If these conditions exist, any old match will do. "And nobody," Watts says wryly, "will go around talking about the exceptional properties of the spark that started the fire."
So, communicators can (and do) spend lots of time crafting the right message. Or training the leader to communicate better. Or identifying the right vehicle or channel for communication. All of which are roughly equivalent to getting a really neat spark together.
Instead, if you really want to ignite change, prepare the ground. Raise awareness of the problems, shift the environment, stimulate the conversations. And through these, stimulate the social network, don't analyse it. Because, in traditional complex vs complicated terms, you'll spot the influential in retrospect and expect them to take that role next time.
As Watts points out, viral thinkers analyze trends after they've broken out. "They start with an existing trend, like Hush Puppies, and they go backward until they've identified the people who did it first, and then they go, 'Okay, these are the Influentials!'" But who's to say those aren't just Watts's accidental Influentials, random smokers who walked, unwittingly, into a dry forest? East Village hipsters were wearing lots of cool things in the fall of 1994. But, as Watts wondered, why did only Hush Puppies take off? Why didn't their other clothing choices reach a tipping point too?
So for communicators, or culture change agents, it's better to invest in two other areas altogether - preparing the ground and trying lots of sparks. Some will die out, but then some will catch in ways that you can't predict. And that unpredictability is, I suspect, why few comms teams are so far willing to go this route.
- Narrative (100)
- Organisational culture (95)
- Communications (93)
- Complexity (77)
- SenseMaker (77)
- Changing organisations (42)
- Cognitive Edge (37)
- Narrate news (35)
- narrative research (32)
- Cognitive science (25)
- Tools and techniques (25)
- Conference references (24)
- Recommendations (20)
- datespecific (20)
- Leadership (17)
- Employee engagement (16)
- Storytelling (15)
- Culture (13)
- Events (11)
- UNDP (11)
- Cynefin (10)
- hints and tips (10)
- internal communications (8)
- Engagement (7)
- Knowledge (6)
- M&E (6)
- customer insight (6)
- tony quinlan (6)
- Branding (5)
- Stories (5)
- culture change (5)
- Children of the World (4)
- Dave Snowden (4)
- Changing organisations (3)
- Courses (3)
- GirlHub (3)
- Medinge (3)
- Travel (3)
- anecdote circles (3)
- development (3)
- knowledge management (3)
- merger (3)
- micro-narratives (3)
- monitoring and evaluation (3)
- presentations (3)
- BRAC (2)
- Bratislava (2)
- Egypt (2)
- ILO (2)
- Narattive research (2)
- Roma (2)
- Uncategorized (2)
- VECO (2)
- citizen engagement (2)
- corporate culture (2)
- counter-terrorism (2)
- customer satisfaction (2)
- diversity (2)
- governance (2)
- impact measurement (2)
- innovation (2)
- masterclass (2)
- melcrum (2)
- monitoring (2)
- narrate (2)
- organisation culture (2)
- organisational storytelling (2)
- research (2)
- sensemaker case study (2)
- sensemaking (2)
- social networks (2)
- speaker (2)
- strategy (2)
- workshops (2)
- 2012 Olympics (1)
- Adam Curtis (1)
- Allders of Sutton (1)
- CASE (1)
- Cabinets and the Bomb (1)
- Central Library (1)
- Chernobyl (1)
- Christmas (1)
- Disaster relief (1)
- Duncan Green (1)
- ESRC (1)
- Employee surveys (1)
- European commission (1)
- Fail-safe (1)
- Financial Times anecdote circles SenseMaker (1)
- FlashForward (1)
- Fragments of Impact (1)
- Future Backwards (1)
- GRU (1)
- Girl Research Unit (1)
- House of Lords (1)
- Huffington Post (1)
- IQPC (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Joshua Cooper Ramo (1)
- KM (1)
- KMUK2010 (1)
- Kharian and Box (1)
- LFI (1)
- LGComms (1)
- Lant Pritchett (1)
- Learning From Incidents (1)
- Lords Speaker lecture (1)
- MLF (1)
- MandE (1)
- Montenegro (1)
- Mosaic (1)
- NHS (1)
- ODI (1)
- OTI (1)
- Owen Barder (1)
- PR (1)
- Peter Hennessy (1)
- Pfizer (1)
- Protected Areas (1)
- Rwanda (1)
- SenseMaker® collector ipad app (1)
- Serbia (1)
- Sir Michael Quinlan (1)
- Slides (1)
- Speaking (1)
- Sutton (1)
- TheStory (1)
- UK justice (1)
- USS vincennes (1)
- United Nations Development Programme (1)
- Washington storytelling (1)
- acquisition (1)
- adaptive management (1)
- afghanistan (1)
- aid and development (1)
- al-qaeda (1)
- algeria (1)
- all in the mind (1)
- anthropology (1)
- applications (1)
- back-story (1)
- better for less (1)
- case study (1)
- change communications (1)
- change management (1)
- citizen experts (1)
- communication (1)
- communications research (1)
- complaints (1)
- complex adaptive systems (1)
- complex probes (1)
- conference (1)
- conferences (1)
- conspiracy theories (1)
- consultation (1)
- content management (1)
- corporate values (1)
- counter narratives (1)
- counter-insurgency (1)
- counter-narrative (1)
- creativity (1)
- customer research (1)
- deresiewicz (1)
- deterrence (1)
- dissent (1)
- downloads (1)
- education (1)
- employee (1)
- ethical audit (1)
- ethics (1)
- evaluation (1)
- facilitation (1)
- fast company (1)
- feedback loops (1)
- financial services (1)
- financial times (1)
- four yorkshiremen (1)
- gary klein (1)
- georgia (1)
- girl effect (1)
- girleffect (1)
- giving voice (1)
- globalgiving (1)
- harnessing complexity (1)
- impact evaluation (1)
- impact measures (1)
- information overload (1)
- informatology (1)
- innovative communications (1)
- john kay (1)
- justice (1)
- kcuk (1)
- keynote (1)
- leadership recession communication (1)
- learning (1)
- libraries (1)
- likert scale (1)
- lucifer effect (1)
- marketing (1)
- minimum level of failure (1)
- narrative capture (1)
- narrative sensemaker internal communications engag (1)
- natasha mitchell (1)
- navigating complexity (1)
- new york times (1)
- newsletter (1)
- obliquity (1)
- organisation (1)
- organisational development (1)
- organisational memory (1)
- organisational narrative (1)
- patterns (1)
- pilot projects (1)
- placement (1)
- policy-making (1)
- population research (1)
- presentation (1)
- protocols of the elders of zion. (1)
- public policy (1)
- public relations (1)
- qualitative research (1)
- quangos (1)
- relations (1)
- reputation management (1)
- resilience (1)
- revenge (1)
- ritual dissent (1)
- road signs (1)
- safe-fail (1)
- safe-to-fail experiments (1)
- sales improvement (1)
- satisfaction (1)
- scaling (1)
- seminar (1)
- seth godin (1)
- social coherence (1)
- social cohesion (1)
- solitude (1)
- stakeholder understanding (1)
- strategic communications management (1)
- strategic narrative (1)
- suggestion schemes (1)
- surveys (1)
- survivorship bias (1)
- targets (1)
- tbilisi (1)
- the future backwards (1)
- tipping point (1)
- training (1)
- twitter (1)
- upskilling (1)
- values (1)
- video (1)
- voices (1)
- weak links (1)
- zeno's paradox (1)
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (2)
- March 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (1)
- November 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (1)
- March 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (1)
- January 2016 (1)
- July 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (1)
- March 2015 (2)
- February 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- November 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (1)
- July 2014 (2)
- June 2014 (6)
- May 2014 (3)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (5)
- January 2014 (4)
- December 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (1)
- June 2013 (1)
- May 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- October 2012 (4)
- September 2012 (3)
- November 2011 (3)
- August 2011 (1)
- July 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (4)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (8)
- January 2011 (8)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (5)
- October 2010 (8)
- September 2010 (5)
- August 2010 (2)
- June 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (3)
- October 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- July 2008 (4)
- June 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (3)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (1)
- September 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (4)
- May 2007 (3)
- March 2007 (1)
- February 2007 (6)
- January 2007 (3)
- November 2006 (8)
- October 2006 (8)
- September 2006 (2)
- August 2006 (5)
- July 2006 (13)
Subscribe by email
You May Also Like
These Related Stories